.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

teddy sheringham poker

teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham
  • Teddy Sheringham



  • toddybody
    Mar 22, 01:59 PM
    A rumor about a Mac? This is getting weird:rolleyes:

    Seriously though, I hope they really kick butt with this refresh...and give the iMac a good GPU for once*




    *pipe dream





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham y Christian
  • Teddy Sheringham y Christian



  • ten-oak-druid
    Mar 29, 03:29 PM
    LOL - that is ridiculous.

    I think they meant that the number of windows phone viruses will top the number of iphone viruses.





    teddy sheringham poker. Poker Players
  • Poker Players



  • Stridder44
    Apr 14, 11:56 AM
    I think my next computer will be an Ivy Bridge MBA with Thunderbolt. My 2007 Macbook is getting a bit long in tooth.

    Same thoughts here. My early '08 MBP is starting to really show its' age (especially its' 8600M GT).

    Thank goodness Intel will be supporting USB3 for our peripherals.

    I'm sure I'm not the only one here who is barely tolerating the mouse and keyboard lag from the slower USB2 port.

    You know that hard drives and other devices see a nice speed gain wi-- never mind, I know you must be joking and know the real benefits of USB 3.

    Now that it's part of the platform Apple has no excuse for not including it. However, it wouldn't surprise me to see a MBP with this platform that still only has 2.0 connectors.

    Heh, that is totally something Apple would manage to do.

    "But sir, we can't remove it, it's built into the chipset itself..."
    "I don't care, damn it. Re-solder an older chipset on to it then."
    "But..." *head asplodes*





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham slog danske
  • Teddy Sheringham slog danske



  • Umbongo
    Mar 23, 01:01 PM
    2012... 18 month update cycle? Far, far too long. No way... If that's the case, for the first time in 27 years, Apple doesn't get my money.

    August 2006
    January 2008 - 17 months later
    March 2009 - 14 months later
    July 2010 - 16 months later

    While spring is possible the processors are to be launched in Q4. It is more likely to be under 18 months, but there is nothing out of the ordinary. Only the 2010 models seemed to be on Apple's time line rather than Intels.

    Of course, part of the reason why people are hesitant to buy them is because they are the last to be updated... even though they are the most expensive product Apple has.

    They have actually been the first to be updated for most of the time because Intel launched new technology on these platforms first. First to get 65nm Core 2 processor technology, first to get 45nm Penryn Core 2, first to get Nehalem (Core i5/i7). If Apple had updated on time in 2010 they'd have been first then to get Westmere (Apple released 4 months after the processor launch). Intel have changed their release schedule from enthusiast and Enterprise coming first with the move to Sandy Bridge, mostly because the benefits are more to the mobile market due to power savings.





    teddy sheringham poker. Bent and Teddy Sheringham
  • Bent and Teddy Sheringham



  • mi5moav
    Oct 12, 04:19 PM
    I hope somehow apple creates forum software with spotlight search so as soon as I start typing something it searches through 500 pages of posts and on the right side of the screen will show similar comments, who posted it, and on what pages similar comments are/where posted.





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham: Tay chơi
  • Teddy Sheringham: Tay chơi



  • gauriemma
    Sep 12, 02:21 PM
    Kind of a huge gap, don'cha think? For an extra $100 I can nearly TRIPLE the capacity? Why would I even consider a 30 GB model?





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham é o 5º
  • Teddy Sheringham é o 5º



  • hulugu
    Apr 20, 04:54 PM
    Sure is. A hypothetical I like to propose:

    Considering that the discrepancies between "rich" and "poor" as far as voting goes are far over blown (http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/24/even-more-on-income-and-voting/) (Rich DO vote liberal and poor DO vote conservative) with the top third of white income earners STILL voting liberal, despite their high incomes and the ever-pervasive myth that rich people vote republican.

    If this top third of income earners, instead of trying to legislate their charities through democratic votes and the force of law, simply put 50%, 60%, 70%, hell, 90% of their incomes towards charity rather than owning a home, owning multiple vehicles, owning boats, "traveling", shopping at Lunds or Kowalskis, etc, the poverty problem would be fixed, or at the very least, helped significantly without forcing ANYBODY to do ANYTHING.

    But then again, these people would rather force everyone to pony up the dough rather than take a hit to their lifestyles.

    Charity is a beautiful thing, but forced charity?

    What programs do you consider to be 'forced charity?'





    teddy sheringham poker. a dig at Teddy Sheringham
  • a dig at Teddy Sheringham



  • emw
    Aug 23, 04:42 PM
    Really, though $100 million isn't all that significant to a company with reserves like Apple has, vs. having a possible patent infringement hanging over them that could, given a ruling against them, cost much more.





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham
  • Teddy Sheringham



  • BRLawyer
    Sep 10, 05:02 AM
    Please explain - I have no idea what "that" is....
    ---

    Regardless of the tool, however, it is usually much better to let the OS dynamically schedule threads across the cores. Unless the programmer has some reason to try to control this, the alternative is some resources (CPUs) being overcommitted, while other CPUs are idle.

    It doesn't matter who has the better tools - it's usually better to let the OS decide microsecond by microsecond how best to schedule the CPUs, than to have the developer make those decisions at edit time.

    I've used the SetProcessAffinityMask APIs fairly often, but it's always been for specific test or benchmark situations. I have a hard time thinking of a situation where a general application would want to statically control the scheduler - it's just "bad think" to even try. (Except for those weird-a$$ NUMA Opterons - you can be really scr3wed if you have to go through HyperTransport to get to memory. I check NUMA topology, and use affinity to keep the AMD architecture from killing me.)

    I also agree it's not the best strategy to deal with CPU scheduling...my example is linked to the following page, I presume...perhaps core affinity scheduling is also there:

    http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/hwprefs.1.html





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham: Hốt bạc
  • Teddy Sheringham: Hốt bạc



  • jamesryanbell
    Apr 25, 05:31 PM
    Did I misread something?

    It said a "case re-design", not a refresh of CPU, GPU, HDD, etc....

    Why is everyone talking about a major technology refresh on a brand new MBP? My guess is that they opened up sweat shops in some third world country to file down the edges.... :-)

    R

    By the time the redesigned MBP is out, it'll be time for a massive major refresh.





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham
  • Teddy Sheringham



  • Aldaris
    Mar 22, 02:32 PM
    I think you'll find that rumors of the Mac Pro's death are greatly exaggerated.

    Thunderbolt honestly wouldn't bring very much to a Mac Pro right now. They have access via PCI expansion to drives, etc. that keep pace with and even beat Thunderbolt in some instances. As the tech matures it will outpace others and eventually find its way to the Mac Pro. Yes, the iMacs, and the iToys get more and more powerful with every generation...but then, so do the Pros...they all have a space on Apple's buffet bar.

    I agree, I think it'll be great for the portable's and consumer items, to be able to customize certain peripherals to the individual needs, at the moment I have a PowerBook G4, MacBook Pro, Power Mac G4, Power Mac G5, all for certain tasks, I could solve all this with a thunderbolt equipped MacBook pro and Mini... Think of the space saving's there...

    The Pro will be around for a lot longer, it just serves a Pro/sumer market, the processors they sport generally come later down the pipe anyway like sandy bridge xeons in Q3/Q4.





    teddy sheringham poker. Seat 8: Teddy Sheringham,
  • Seat 8: Teddy Sheringham,



  • TheNightPhoenix
    Sep 12, 06:37 PM
    Please explain exactly how from where you did that. I am still trying with handbrake and EyeTV. The EyeTV2 export is supposed to be connected to the QuickTime but the iPod default is not H.264 640x480 in the EyetV2 Export windows.

    just before i jump between covers.... a rip from handbrake in 100% quality i had from before, DV Pal footage, 720p and 1080i footage all opened in quicktime and just gone to export for iPod all worked fine.





    teddy sheringham poker. teddy sheringham
  • teddy sheringham



  • aiqw9182
    Apr 25, 02:55 PM
    Please :rolleyes:

    Do you mean they lack the power or that its not a selectable option? They have the power, have had it for years. Dual 2560x1600 screen setups off one graphics card is easily attainable.

    Then show me a single modern GPU displaying more than 2560x1600 on a single display. I'd love to see it.





    teddy sheringham poker. Cult Heroes: Teddy Sheringham
  • Cult Heroes: Teddy Sheringham



  • Mr_Ed
    Mar 30, 11:24 AM
    I don't claim to know a thing about trademark law, but looking at this simply I find it difficult to understand how the term "Windows" can become a trademark but "App Store" cannot.





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham
  • Teddy Sheringham



  • Eraserhead
    Nov 13, 05:16 PM
    Apple is the copyright holder of those images and they provide the right to use those images in Applications running on macs via the API on a Mac running OS X.

    So why can't you use an official Apple API on the iPhone? That's crazy.





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham,
  • Teddy Sheringham,



  • zenmac
    Jul 15, 07:51 AM
    Have anybody seen a benchmark which compares the core 2 duo with the actuall core duo?

    I can only see benchmarks between core 2 duo and AMD CPU's and standard dual core Pentium 4 cpu.

    Thanks
    Masoud





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham Teddy
  • Teddy Sheringham Teddy



  • Eidorian
    Sep 9, 11:53 AM
    You may be right.

    I couldn't find anything in the Intel technical documentation on the 945 to show a new revision or stepping of the chip - in fact most of the 945 docs at the Intel website don't mention the Core 2 at all....That's what tipped me off as well. I've had to hit those tech pages to glean information off of them.





    teddy sheringham poker. teddy sheringham penalty. teddy sheringham penalty. 0:26. teddy sheringham scores the first west ham fa cup goal against blackburn then we went on to be
  • teddy sheringham penalty. teddy sheringham penalty. 0:26. teddy sheringham scores the first west ham fa cup goal against blackburn then we went on to be



  • dsnort
    Sep 19, 06:26 PM
    I can't wait until I can get access to movies from around the world instead of just insipid Hollywood crap.

    And a hearty Amen and hell yeah for that!





    teddy sheringham poker. Teddy Sheringham during his
  • Teddy Sheringham during his



  • PstLMac
    May 3, 10:31 AM
    I bought my 1st iMAC 27" last year and I'm extremely happy with it!
    I have no need for a second monitor since it's so wide.
    So besides the dual external display on the 2011 what else...?
    Are we missing anything else from the reported update notes???
    Thunderbolt seems cool, but my iMAC is pretty fast as is. I guess I was wondering if the new update was going to make me jealous...NOT.
    Maybe next refresh,,,;)





    sam10685
    Sep 10, 09:14 AM
    Wonder how the 24" iMac at 2.33GHz will fare.

    i don't know-- but i have a feeling it'll be really fast and a good seller. i'd go to the Apple Store down town and look at the 20" iMac and think "goodness... any bigger and it wouldn't fit on the table." now, for the same price as a 30'' ACD, you get a monitor that is just a little smaller than the 30" PLUS you get a really really good computer. if Apple does't sell a large ammount of these than something is wrong.





    Evangelion
    Aug 29, 05:20 AM
    Personally I believe all companies not only have an obligation to go public

    Let's just say that I disagree with you 100%. What if you start a small company, should Joe Sixpack down the street have the god-given right to buy shares in your company? If he does, why doesn't he have the right to buy your car if he wants to?

    ...allowing actual democracy to pervade rather than increasingly fascist corporatocracy.

    You do realize that the "fascist corporatocracy" that we have today has been created, maintained and exploited by public corporations?

    Personally I'd rather pay a lot more for my Macs, have them updated a lot less often and even suffer decreases in the rate of performance improvements, if it meant that the people who manufactured the computers were paid enough to sustain themselves and their families in comfortable, suitable housing with enough money left over for an enjoyable life.

    What makes you think that they are not being paid enough as it is?





    Erasmus
    Sep 9, 02:27 AM
    Ah, less money for 4" more screen, a ~20% faster C2D CPU, a much much faster GPU, etc? Thankyou mister Jobs! Can't wait to see what Tuesday's iPods will be like! Not that I intend to get one, or maybe I do? Who knows? And here's to some sort of Mac with Kentsfield and R600 (More likely G80 :( ) at Macworld or maybe even earlier with a bit of luck!

    It's good to know that one can get a 24" screen, 2.33 Core 2 Duo goodness with the Geforce 7600 256Mb and 2 gig RAM from 5 grand with enough cash spare to buy a new Macbook. (Well at least in edu pricing)

    BTW, this is a bit irrelevant, but can anyone explain to me how one gets Xgrid, and what one needs to make it work? ie. Does it cost money, or can it be downloaded from the net, and do u need a FiberChannel card to make it work? Would be cool to have a Macbook Xgridded to a 24" iMac. Preferrably Merom Macbook and Conroe iMac. But might take a while to get that :o

    Never mind. : (
    Need 10.4 Server apparently, and at least 3 computers to make it worthwhile, it looks like.





    Prof.
    Mar 23, 04:45 PM
    You should tell that to my son. Oh wait, you can't, he was murdered someone like you.
    I'm terribly sorry, my deepest condolences. *hug*





    cgc
    Apr 19, 09:23 AM
    Samsung is going to wrap Apple up in a cocoon of pain...

    (quote from Tommy Morrison before the Tyson fight that never happened)